Chorley resurrected? High court finds employed solicitor rule applies to law firms
The question of whether law firms can recover costs for employed solicitors representing them has been settled, but several new questions abound.
The question of whether law firms can recover costs for employed solicitors representing them has been settled, but several new questions abound.
Recent cases highlight the dynamic relevance of public interest in costs decisions. How do courts balance access to justice with the adversarial tradition?
The modified equal access model includes new concepts like ‘unreasonable act or omission’ and ‘significant power advantage’.
Following the NSW Supreme Court decision in Dive Lawyers, it appears law practices can now recover costs outside the 12 month limitation period.
On 27 June 2024, the Court entered judgment in the amount of $2 million in favour of Network Ten for their costs of defending the…
Costs in Lehrmann matter to be referred to referee and Lehrmann has been granted an extension of time until 31 May 2024 to lodge an…
There may be a time where a client doesn’t pay your bill and there are ways the solicitor can recover the amount.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether firms can recover costs for work done by employed solicitors when the firm is self-represented.
When it comes to third party funding in litigation, practitioners should note the broad powers of the court in making third-party costs orders.
Recent Court of Appeal decision in Bevan v Bingham provides valuable guidance on key Uniform Law provisions relating to void costs agreements.
The recent Supreme Court decision in Bevan v Bingham confirms the ongoing disclosure obligations of solicitors and barristers when it comes to legal costs.
Rewind 2021: need-to-know developments in the law of costs
Part two of a two-part article analysing pitfalls in the Legal Profession Uniform Law regime for costs assessment.