By -

Key decisions

  • May v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2015] FCAFC 93
  • Minister for Health v Nicholl Holdings Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 73
  • Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Han [2015] FCAFC 79
  • Truthful Endeavour Pty Ltd v Condon [2015] FCAFC 70
  • SZWBH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 88
  • Shrestha v Migration Review Tribunal [2015] FCAFC 87
  • Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83
  • SZTOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 77
  • Sims v Chong [2015] FCAFC 80
  • SZOXP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 69

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Appeal on question of law – review of AAT decisions by judicial review Workers compensation – ‘injury’

In May v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2015] FCAFC 93 (30 June 2015) and Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92 (30 June 2015) a Full Court of five members concluded the right to appeal to the Federal Court from the AAT given by s 44 of the AAT Act 1975 (Cth) was not to be narrowly confined and was an ample provision enabling appeals on questions of substance not form. Consideration of reviewing AAT decisions under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth). Review in Haritos of what is a ‘question of law’; review in May as to what is an ‘injury’.

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more