By -


  • Misappropriation of clients’ funds, even if intended to be temporary, constitutes professional misconduct.
  • Misleading an investigator amounts to obstruction, which also constitutes professional misconduct.
  • Candour to the Tribunal, together with a demonstration of insight and remorse, is important.
  • In essence, honesty is a vital facet of good professional conduct.

In June, the NSW Court of Appeal delivered judgment in Kumar v Legal Services Commissioner [2015] NSWCA 161. The decision provides a useful framework for an analysis of honesty in the practice of law.

Mr Kumar was a solicitor. His name was removed from the Roll of Practitioners following findings of professional misconduct, including dishonesty and misappropriation.

The then Administrative Decisions Tribunal made a decision on the substantive matters in February 2013 (Legal Services Commissioner v Kumar [2013] NSWADT 34) and NCAT made a decision in relation to orders in May 2014 (Legal Services Commissioner v Kumar [2014] NSWCATOD 45).

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more