By -

Key decisions

  • Gold Coast Marine Aquaculture Pty Ltd v HTC Trading Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1995
  • Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1932
  • Autosports Castle Hill Pty Ltd v Altitude Brighton Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 2065
  • Meneses v Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 190

Practice and procedure

Requirements in preliminary discovery application

In Gold Coast Marine Aquaculture Pty Ltd v HTC Trading Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1995
(27 November 2019) the Court granted the applicant’s application for preliminary discovery pursuant to rule 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011, which concerns discovery from a prospective respondent, against the respondent and a commonwealth department. There are three elements to rule 7.23, namely: 

  1. a reasonable belief that it may have right to obtain relief from the prospective respondent (7.23(1)(a));
  2. after making reasonable inquiries, it does not have sufficient information to decide whether to start a proceeding (7.23(1)(b)); and 
  3. a belief that the prospective respondent has relevant documents that would assist (7.23(1)(c)).

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more