How retainers reduce risk: scope, costs and client expectations
What are you retained to do, who are you acting for and how much will it cost? This article examines why those questions matter.
What are you retained to do, who are you acting for and how much will it cost? This article examines why those questions matter.
The Court denied a plaintiff use of the Brickendon exception for a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, even though the solicitor acted for both parties.
While the Scheme can limit liability, recent cases reveal important exceptions and potential conflicts with professional indemnity insurance.
State appellant courts do not always have jurisdiction to hear appeals from their own supreme courts.
Get around the main features of the Supreme Court Practice Note, including its prohibitions and the consequences of misuse.
The recent NSWCA decision, Odlum v Friend, highlights the importance of contemporaneous written records.
A recent decision finds the existence of a general retainer is not proof of engagement to act in a particular transaction.
Losing track of who you are acting for is not unusual, especially with complex families, but it can have serious consequences.
Discussion of legal privilege use in the context of cyber attacks, how practitioners and clients are adapting, and how the courts are responding.
Jen McMillan unpacks the Court’s narrow interpretation of ‘ordinarily resident’ and provides valuable practice notes and updates on residential land purchasing.
Recent Supreme Court decision confirms solicitors have an obligation to advise clients on obvious practical implications of transactions which are the subject of advice.
Courts have held that a solicitor’s role can extend to advising on and severing joint tenancies where applicable.
A recent decision has confirmed the general principle that solicitor’s duty is owed solely to their client and the Court.