Serious harm threshold in defamation law still poses contention
Since 2021, the introduction of the “serious harm” threshold has been contentious in its potential to be ambiguous. The onus is on the plaintiff to…
Since 2021, the introduction of the “serious harm” threshold has been contentious in its potential to be ambiguous. The onus is on the plaintiff to…
As the boundary between private discourse and public evidence continues to blur, the Law Society’s Annual Conference has set the stage for a critical discussion…
Silencing through litigation—why Australia needs stronger protections for those reporting sexual misconduct.
A deep dive tracing the rise of public interest as a legal standard in defamation—from common law privilege to section 29A.
Defamation law is becoming more complex and inconsistent between jurisdictions. What can you do to mitigate risk in this changing area of law?
The Federal Court considers a unique fact scenario which conjures pertinent questions of law, such as what makes a judgement final?
Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has lost his defamation case against Network 10 and journalist Lisa Wilkinson.
The Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation trial continues as Network 10’s legal team successfully convinced Federal Court to hear new evidence.
‘Stage 2’ reforms and what they will mean for the future of ‘digital defamation’.
Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case dismissed after judge finds Nine newspapers proved allegations against him were true.
The Federal Government’s proposed privacy law reforms could result in an inundation of the court system and have a “chilling effect” on public interest journalism,…