New approaches to expert evidence: the High Court on counterintuitive evidence

BQ v The King demonstrates an expanding scope for counterintuitive evidence and clarifies how expert context guides juries without straying into vouching.

By - 2 min read

Costs cases post-Birketu: law firms and the employed solicitor rule

Can incorporated practices claim costs for their own lawyers? Two recent cases test the limits and raise further questions.

By and - 2 min read

New approaches in expert evidence: the High Court on transparency

Lang v The Queen discusses how expert evidence must be transparent, reasoned and grounded in proven expertise—not mere assertion.

By - 1 min read

The equation of settlement: how to decide when to take it or leave it

A structured three-step methodology for quantifying the value of litigation, enabling you to give precise advice on settlement decisions.

By - 2 min read

No slice for solicitors: High Court draws the line on CFOs

What courts can authorise—and what state law still forbids—when it comes to funding representative proceedings.

By - 1 min read

Context, the Crown and circularity: recent statutory interpretation developments

The High Court has signalled some subtle shifts in the well-established principles of statutory interpretation. How will they impact your practice?

By - 1 min read

Settled yet unpredictable: recent cases on apprehended bias

From heated exchanges to prior roles, recent cases show how apprehended bias is reshaping judicial accountability — and why reform may be on the horizon.

By - 2 min read

Strangers at the gates: claims against solicitors by non-clients

Not your client, not your problem? Think again. How third parties can hold solicitors accountable for what they say and do.

By and - 2 min read

Solicitors’ rules and ethical responsibilities when dealing with older clients

The proliferation of elder abuse has highlighted the fundamental and unique role solicitors play in preventing this new epidemic.

By - 2 min read

How do we hold judges accountable for a ‘thoroughly unacceptable abuse of judicial power’?

An expert analysis of the High Court decision which is relevant to the wider conversation about the appropriate accountability of federal court judges.

By - 2 min read