By and -


  • Advice on mortgages and guarantees should not be cursory, superficial or incomplete.
  • It is necessary to explain clearly the purpose and effect of guarantees or mortgages.
  • Solicitors should be wary when asked to advise clients who are borrowing for the benefit of family members or other third parties when the clients’ home is offered as security.
  • Always advise on risks, especially where the client is providing security for a third party’s benefit.

The potential exposures that solicitors face when advising on security documents where the person gaining the benefit of the transaction is a third party have again been highlighted in recent cases.

A third party guarantor must be given ‘competent, independent and objective’ advice on the purpose and effect of the transaction (Alceon Group Pty Ltd v Rose [2015] NSWSC 868).

Where the terms of a loan are harsh and oppressive there is plainly a requirement for advice to be given as to both the legal effect and the risks associated with entering into the security transaction (Bakovski v Lenehan [2014] NSWSC 671).

It is necessary to provide advice in terms that the mortgagor or guarantor can understand.

In acting for a mortgagor, guarantor or person providing some other form of security on a loan, particularly a loan to a third party, it is prudent to consider:

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more