By -

Key developments

  • Use of AI in the Federal Court
  • Workers Compensation Amendment Bill 2025
  • Sunsetting of the National Redress Scheme

Use of AI in the Federal Court

The Litigation Law and Practice, Privacy and Data Law, Business Law, and Ethics Committees made a submission to the Law Council of Australia ahead of the Federal Court’s consultation on the development of guidelines or a practice note about the use of generative AI (‘Gen AI’) by practitioners and court users.

Our submission expressed support for the development of Federal Court guidelines or a practice note. We noted that, while practitioners hold varying views on the level of prescription that should be adopted, they generally favour a hybrid model based on overarching guiding principles with mechanisms for disclosure of Gen AI use in certain limited circumstances. The submission also highlighted that a principles-based guidance or practice note could be aligned with existing professional and ethical obligations—as outlined in the statement on the use of AI in Australian legal practice, jointly issued by the Law Society of NSW, the Legal Practice Board of WA, and the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner. The incorporation of transparency safeguards through disclosure also acknowledges the understandable uncertainty surrounding Gen AI which is often seen as inherently unreliable.

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more