17 minutes of regret: a rare example of a successful misfeasance in public office claim
How a knowing failure to read mandatory material was enough to satisfy the demanding mental element of the notoriously difficult-to-prove tort.
How a knowing failure to read mandatory material was enough to satisfy the demanding mental element of the notoriously difficult-to-prove tort.
When does ordinary construction become unlawful interference? The High Court’s return to Bamford offers a sharper rule for practitioners confronting nuisance claims.
Law firms are seeing demand, and some panic, from businesses seeking guidance on Australia’s new statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy.