High Court: February 2026
New High Court rulings clarify contractual waiver and abuse‑of‑process principles, and reaffirm the limits of the implied freedom in visa refusals.
New High Court rulings clarify contractual waiver and abuse‑of‑process principles, and reaffirm the limits of the implied freedom in visa refusals.
BQ v The King demonstrates an expanding scope for counterintuitive evidence and clarifies how expert context guides juries without straying into vouching.
Precedent-setting rulings on cultural heritage forfeiture and whether surveillance evidence legislation is unconstitutional.
Rulings on Crown land use, tribunal jurisdiction and electoral authorisation—refining statutory interpretation and constitutional boundaries.
The FWC can now scrutinise business models, outsourcing and risk appetite when judging redeployment feasibility.
Precedent-setting cases on the grounds of criminal appeal and revocation of special leave to appeal to the High Court.
In ruling against the ATO, the High Court stressed a few key points that hint at how diverted profits and royalty withholding tax should be…
Precedent-setting cases on how to value improved land and whether placing the CFMEU into administration burdened the freedom of political communication.
Precedent-setting cases on when Victorian courts can set aside child abuse settlements and a controversial notice to class action members.
The High Court has signalled some subtle shifts in the well-established principles of statutory interpretation. How will they impact your practice?
Precedent-setting cases on group costs orders as a rationale for transferring proceedings, native title extinguishment and unlawful detention.
Precedent-setting cases on the in-house lawyer rule, injunctions by unlawful non-citizens and NSCOs for the not guilty by mental impairment.
A divided High Court has handed down a controversial decision that touches on fundamental principles in trust law and creates practical issues.