Bodily autonomy as a ‘lawful interest’: what Potter means for NSW practitioners
By elevating bodily integrity and personal safety within the analysis, the High Court has provided fresh guidance on a recurring evidentiary issue.
By elevating bodily integrity and personal safety within the analysis, the High Court has provided fresh guidance on a recurring evidentiary issue.
The Court revisited the Kable doctrine and struck down an ancient law, highlighting the cost of legislative inertia and delayed statutory reform.
BQ v The King demonstrates an expanding scope for counterintuitive evidence and clarifies how expert context guides juries without straying into vouching.