By -

Key decisions

  • Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 144
  • Batterham v Goldberg [2014] FCAFC 136
  • Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 148
  • Luck v University of South Queensland [2014] FCAFC 135
  • Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Lesianawai [2014] FCAFC 141
  • SZSSJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 143
  • WZARH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 137
  • Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSNSW [2014] FCAFC 145
  • SZSPI v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 140
  • Oil Basins Ltd v Watson [2014] FCAFC 154
  • Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150

Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy notice – whether copy of final judgment ‘attached’ – curing of defects

In Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 144 (30 October 2014) a Full Court found the requirement of s 41 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) that the final judgment be ‘attached’ to the bankruptcy notice when it was issued was satisfied where the application for the notice was sent, and the notice was issued, by email.

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more