By -

Snapshot

  • The ability to obtain forensic material, which may be used in a case against them, runs contrary to both the traditional right against self-incrimination and, where obtained without consent, the right to silence
  • Where a person does not consent to a forensic procedure, a magistrate may order a procedure be carried out
  • In respect of ordering both intimate and non-intimate procedures, a magistrate must be satisfied of certain criteria

The Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (the Act) gives police broad powers to obtain forensic material from a person, both with and without their consent. The Act authorises the taking of forensic material by both non-intimate and intimate procedures, as defined in s3(1).

The ability to obtain forensic material, which may be used in a case against them, runs contrary to both the traditional right against self-incrimination and, where obtained without consent, the right to silence.

In those circumstances, and consistent with the principle of legality, it has been held that “[a]uthorisation under the Act can only be granted strictly in accordance with its provisions”: Walker v Bugden (2005) 155 A Crim R 416 at [53]. Any doubt should be resolved in favour of the person from whom the forensic material is sought.

You've reached the end of this article preview

There's more to read! Subscribe to LSJ today to access the rest of our updates, articles and multimedia content.

Subscribe to LSJ

Already an LSJ subscriber or Law Society member? Sign in to read the rest of the article.

Sign in to read more