- Fairbairn v Radecki  HCA 18
- Mayhew & Fairweather  FedCFamC1A 53
- Wickham & Toledano  FedCFamC1F 32
- Kartal & Templeman  FedCFamC1A 46
De facto thresholds – ‘breakdown’ of a de facto relationship is the trigger point for jurisdiction – aggregate of circumstances supported conclusion that relationship had broken down
In Fairbairn v Radecki  HCA 18 (11 May 2022) the High Court (Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Gleeson JJ) heard an appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia.
The New South Wales Trustee & Guardian (‘Trustee’) as case guardian for the de facto wife sought orders for sale of a home to pay for the wife’s care accommodation. The de facto husband argued the Court lacked jurisdiction as the parties had not separated.
While the trial judge agreed; the Full Court found that decision contained error as it imputed an intention to separate rather than assessing indicia.
The High Court held (from ):
‘A de facto relationship will have broken down when, having regard to all the circumstances, the parties no longer “have a relationship as a couple living together on a genuine domestic basis”. …
 … It is the “breakdown” or “end” of a de facto relationship that is the trigger point for the … Court to be seized of jurisdiction to make a property settlement order … It would make no sense for … jurisdiction to arise before a de facto relationship had ended …
 … [C]ohabitation of a residence … is not a necessary feature of “living together”. … Two people … may not reside in the same residence, but nonetheless be in a de facto relationship …
 The fact that here the appellant was placed into an aged care facility may be relevant to the existence or breakdown of a de facto relationship … but it could not … be determinative of that issue. …
 Whilst there had been a degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, that commitment ceased when the respondent refused to make the “necessary or desirable adjustments” in support of the appellant and … acted contrary to her needs. …
 In aggregate, these circumstances support the conclusion that there had been a breakdown in the parties’ de facto relationship …’
The appeal was allowed, with the appeal to the Full Court dismissed.