By Craig Nicol and Keleigh Robinson -
Key decisions
- Costello & Langdon [2024] FedCFamC1A 168
- Handa & Mallick [2024] FedCFamC2F 957
- Giordano v Giordano [2024] FCWA 182
- Kuang & Kuang [2024] FedCFamC2F 1191
PROPERTY
Stanford distinguished – husband lived in aged care but parties had separated – Court did not err by considering s 90SM(4) when determining it was just and equitable to divide the parties’ property
In Costello & Langdon [2024] FedCFamC1A 168 (24 September 2024), the Full Court (Aldridge, Austin & Tree JJ) heard a de facto wife’s appeal from property orders following a 41 year relationship which ended when the de facto husband entered aged care in 2021.
The trial judge ordered a 64:36 adjustment in favour of the de facto wife.
The Full Court said (from [21]):